The economic situation of the US requires a rapid changeover to renewable energy, but the united propaganda of eternally yesterday's fossils and "save restrict refrain" climate protectors has won. If these two powers form an alliance, it is as effective as if Hitler and Stalin fought together against the USA.
In 1995, I was at a solar energy startup manager for marketing and application engineering. The founder knew quite well with internas of the former GDR. Thus it was already clear in 1980 that due to economic problems a revolution between 1990 and 2000 is inevitable. Therefore, take a look at the economic data of the US.
Trade Balance - click the [MAX] button
Every US citizen imports around US$ 1700 more than he exports. For a family of four, this is already US $ 6800, every year.
US oil production currently 9.342 million barrels a day
USA Oil imports and exports.
The US imports oil to export it as refined end products. There are about 5 million barrels more imports than exports. This defies the whole fracking industry, which accounts for almost half of US oil production. 5 million barrels * US $ 50 * 365 days = US$ 91.25 billion, 17% of the US trade deficit. But how is the oil price developing? What is the state of the oil resources of Saudi Arabia? Have a look at the face of a poker player and try to find out if he has good or bad cards. Does he have a Royal Flash or is he doing so?
Without fracking, US oil imports would be 9 million barrels * US $ 130 * 365 days = US $ 427 billion. Between today's oil price and the oil price of June 2008 are only 4.5 million barrels of oil from fracking. A simultaneous sharp drop in US oil production from fracking and Saudi Arabia would cause a very severe economic crisis in the US.
Is it conceivable that such a country dependent on oil importation with an uncertain future of its own oil industry, how long does fracking continue, thinks the future is fossil energy? No, it's unimaginable, it's just unimaginable stupidity. That's why I believed in the US election campaign, Trump would finally be convinced by the economic arguments and become a large fan of renewable energy and electric mobility. With so much stupidity I simply could not reckon.
In the rest, the US also imports more natural gas than exports. Here, however, the amounts are quite small. Only for coal is there more exports than imports.
There would be the whole propaganda of the eternally yesterday's fossils: "Without fossil energy we fall back into the Stone Age". The constant denial of the possibilities of renewable energy, the constant citation of the development stage several decades ago. There would be the whole propaganda of the so-called "climate protectors": "save, restrict, refrain - voluntarily back in the Stone Age".
What is the main argument of the exit fans? "The restriction of energy consumption is destructive for the US".
- The truth: "liberation from dependency on limited fossil fuels, conversion to practically unlimited energy sources".
- The lie "Renewable energy means significant restrictions"
Two great powers of the propaganda campaigns have brought about this stupidity. Let us imagine that Stalin and Hitler had fought together against the USA. What would have remained of the USA? We will see what remains of the US after the victory of the Propaganda powers, "Eternal Yesterday's Fossile" and "Climate Protection is save restrict refrain".
Over the next 30 years, a tripling of the global economy with a simultaneous reduction of fossil energy down to almost zero.
Investment Avalanche - Innovation Avalanche - Economic Boom
Even if the current price development reduces the costs of reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, 12,000 billion a year are not affordable for today's humanity. However, it is affordable in the case of a threefold increase in the global economy and further cost reduction. Why should it be affordable? Thawing Permafrost floors and outgassing methane hydrate are an enormous threat potential for climate development. A little reduction could be too little. Even 100% less CO2 emissions could still be too little. 200% less, ie no further human CO2 emission plus active reduction by filtering and splitting, should be sufficient.
For this, the economic conditions must be created. That this can only work with the creation of worldwide wealth is nevertheless a nice side effect.
|
Religion in the sense of relegere
|
Latin relegere: “to consider carefully, to contemplate, to think about repeatedly, to be thoughtful in view of an important issue.”
This should be the first duty of beings "created in the image of God". In the natural sciences, this happens all the time, before their achievements can have only the greatest respect. The opposite must be said about the politics.
The Infinitism certainly describes the best possible for all currently living humans, nature and future generations to an unimaginably distant future. This spread will require much time and labor.
Please support this lengthy tedious activity with your membership.
|
Short description of all members translated to English
|
The organization to support infinitism has now 54 members from 4 different countries. One international know VIP, 3 localy known VIPs.
When You are not from Germany, Austria, Switzerland or Denmark, take the opportunity to be the first member from Your country.
My book "Calculation ERROR" is now free as a PDF.
|
